I agree that many of your points are reasonable, particularly your historical perspective, focus on public safety, and correction of the Manhattan Project characterization.
However, I believe there are some aspects we should consider more deeply.

Oversimplification: While your examples are relevant, drawing direct parallels between different sectors and time periods may oversimplify these complex issues.

AI-Specific Challenges: AI presents unique challenges and opportunities that might require a different regulatory approach compared to past technologies. A more comprehensive discussion should consider the specific characteristics of AI technology and its regulatory needs.

The Google Case: We should consider Google's experience. Their focus on moral and regulatory issues arguably caused them to fall behind in leading the AI industry.

AI's Inevitable Progress: It's important to recognize that AI development is already rapidly advancing and cannot be stopped. Instead of trying to halt its progress, we should accept this reality and focus on finding ways to utilize AI responsibly and beneficially.

While regulation is necessary, we need to strike a balance that ensures safety without stifling innovation. Our goal should be to harness AI's potential in a healthy and productive manner.