Until I finally saw the movie of the maleficent mistress of evil, I had so much resistance to watch it, I was afraid of the deformation of the archetypal healthy movements that had been shown in the first one: “the healing love between the “bad mother” (the bad godmother/ INJURED amputated from her power by male power ambition) and the motherless daughter with an ambivalent father.

Recently, I facilitated a cinema forum on the topic "Learning Strategies" as part of the extracurricular activities, in the postgraduate degree in management sciences that, after the analysis, yielded interesting reflections from the doctoral students. I will share them in this post while I write my reflections according to my resistance and defenses that calm down.

The truth is, I had to sigh so much, I went through, and I still go through a lot of emotions. Too many story crossings, too many scenes “predictable for emotional manipulation” and too much cult of the blind and emasculated dual life between good and evil with profound Ode to War and Idealization of Peace. I have “a lot of fabric to cut” about it.

Unfortunately, we follow the "Eves" and "the guilty ones that took the man out of Paradise". That metaphor that “everything is fine" until “a Woman does X and everything is damaged" that we bring the evil this time from the cruelest stereotype of” THE MOTHER-in-LAW".

Watching the movie in the cinema forum, I wondered why I was born in such a dual, split, fragmented psycho-socio-historical period

Both inside: mind-body, reason-feeling... as externally: "the good and the bad", the "good and the evil", war and peace... We spent it hanging from one end to the other... judging others as "the bad ones” and assuming ourselves as “the good ones”... “the others are wrong” and we are "the owners of the reason"... I only leave these questions as a reflection product of the analysis in the cinema forum that I did to those present, what does it transmit to them? What comes to you from the feminine energies? Which Trinity is being projected?

Even the internal dialogues are dual, ambivalent, and even antagonistic

I'm not talking about living in "Narnia" that is, in another world, or in a utopia, but with the closest extremes, at least that they come a little closer and are more respectful, more sensible, coherent and that allow us to live longer in alchemical peace than in an intense, latent or reckless war.

Furthermore, I try as much as possible to be an instrument of that peace and rescue and reconnection of that "Original Innocence". It is a shame not to wander on that pendulum; trying to be in the center, with a little of one and the other, is not easy. Sometimes it is achieved. Others don't.

I think that's the balance there, in trying and achieving sometimes yes and sometimes no..... I like the idea of original innocence.... as I see it in children, I think that could help if we really bring out the inner child in its best mental state..."happy”, it seems that pain blinds us and that economic-media interest does not overshadow the priorities of what is most vulnerable.

We must transcend the need to compete, polarize and create “sides of good and bad” so that we do not continue to make banal what is intimate and deep for some because in essence we are equal and the EGO of each one makes the difference by its dual character of judging and criticizing.

Meanwhile, the BEING remains asleep, does not judge, works from love, the one who prefers and does not condition by necessity. Our historical time is more interested in the one who is looking outside; who directs the EGO. The BEING is only interested in people seeking spirituality. There are currently many of us. But here we are in another Ego vs Duality, ... This split is also a human conception and construction.

We must overcome the tit-for-tat inherent in our human condition

Let's ask ourselves, what do you think? What are you feeling? ... so that we can make use of every painful wound to heal, grow, mature, and transcend, and more so we women who right and left the others to call us “Bipolar”.

The educational activity "cinema-forum" ended with this reflection on the film that shows in its principal protagonist one of the most powerful archetypes-metaphors of our psycho-emotional growth, which for me has nothing to do with demonization, and we are who must learn to recognize our vulnerability, our "fragile inner child", our" naive young woman" and our emotions to embrace, shelter, contain and console them."