I understand your frustration, but telling someone to “think for yourself” while not pointing out a single concrete issue doesn’t really help anyone grow.
I’m not here to post low-effort AI spam. I write my own content, I’m learning the platform, and I’m fully open to improving when someone actually explains what exactly needs to be improved.
If the intro feels weak to you, that’s completely fair — but calling it “AI slob” without offering even one practical suggestion isn’t constructive criticism. It’s just venting.
I genuinely want to understand your perspective, but so far there’s nothing specific to work with. Structure? Tone? Format? Length? Tags? Any detail would help more than general insults.
And honestly — if my post was such a “waste of time,” it’s interesting that you still took the time to keep replying. I appreciate that, truly.
I’m here to contribute and learn. If you have something actionable to add, I’ll gladly listen. If not, that’s also perfectly fine.
RE: Ecency waves Nov 24