You can def up the numbers a bit with more AI assistance. In my analysis
We at Magi do 8x the output that Ecency does on what was 3.5x the budget on basically state of the art greenfield tech thats generously speaking 10-20x more complex with 100s of tests and architecture design needed for each feature that doesnt exist elswhere.
And to note, Ecency was in second place behind us, which should tell people that others need to pick up their efficiency quite a bit as well.
We are not competing with serious blockchains at the current rate of development in the ecosystem.
RE: Ecency Proposal Follow-Up: Q&A and Roadmap Clarifications