Yes, you can code 8x faster with AI, but can you review 8x faster? No. Not without being sloppy.
Bro, lets not be absurd. I was being more than fair and generous because not only is this code related but we do hundreds of tests on devnet and then testnet and have to prove the code is safe and working. Its all new tech. Not only does "faster" include code theres multitudes more work going into it.
Your comment makes me skeptical of Magi's safety.
These absurd assumptions are laughable. We run hundreds of audits monthly, penetration tests, spend probably a 100+ hours a month on safety and bug hunting alone. So we use Ai assistance on code but dont use it extensively on security?
These are the kinds of bad faith accusations that are simply emotionally driven due to liking the project that you feel is attacked.
Why would you ship code with known vulnerabilities? Why not fix it first?
What are you talking about? Who is shipping code with known vulnerabilities?
RE: Ecency Proposal Follow-Up: Q&A and Roadmap Clarifications