Yes, I saw a few fragments. I am torn on the idea of father turning in his son. Maybe he was too. On one side, maybe he already failed as a parent if his son learned how to shoot quite well and have access to serious weapons, and he didn't see him possibly turning into an executioner. On the other side, a son is a son, and family is family. Maybe not what it used to be, but still, if family means as much to him as it probably should, this decision will likely give him nightmares for life.

This assassinate will be remembered for a while... Unfortunately, it probably won't be the last. Gun control probably wouldn't solve this, since an individual who really wants access to a weapon can get it from the black market (or perhaps even build it nowadays?). Fewer would, that's true, but I think it has something to do with the American culture (and not only), where (in this case) some individuals think they can erase an idea by physically removing the one(s) propagating it. They achieve the opposite, if it isn't covered up (and sometimes even if it is, years later). It's been tested throughout history, and that's the effect. Sure, maybe Charlie Kirk is raised to a higher level than he deserved in life, due to his death, but the shooter achieved that.