“Do you believe in science?”
Science is not supposed to be an object of faith. I use science as a method of investigation, testing, falsification, prediction, and refinement. The moment someone says “trust the science” as an unquestionable doctrine, they’ve shifted from science into authority and belief.
To believe is have faith because there's uncertainty. To know wouldn't require belief.
Knowledge itself may still be provisional, but belief begins where verification ends.
Science is extremely powerful at measuring mechanisms. It is far weaker at answering questions of meaning, value, consciousness, beauty, purpose, or moral direction.
That's my two cents anyways.
RE: Do You Believe in Science? 🔭