Good morning, Hive account@kenny-crane !

Thank you so much for such a rich thoughts that you placed in our reply.

I'm honored to have your reply (a very complete and fundament one) in my post. I completely can see that you read and put effort in your answer, witch is very rare to see here in Hive. Thank you so much for that!

I see my self as a person that is science based, since I'm a veterinarian.

I choose to believe things that have no evidence but actually have natural explanations, just because I am able to choose to believe some things that are helpful to me yet have low probability of being "true" in a literal sense

I think that sometimes, more pragmatic persons read and listen to religious texts and speeches to literally. Many scripts, most of them were produced more then 3000 years ago, and it were the words that were "found" to explain "complex" things and concepts to the persons in a "simpler" way.

That could be a part of the issue in the cleavage between the "two worlds".

I didn't knew about this author, but as soon as I finish to reply to all the comments that I have in my Hive feed, I'll be back to watch the YT link that you shared.

Thank you so much for your reply. It is a true gem to have your thoughts about this issue.

Have a great Sunday!