Hold on, hold on Jeff. I have a BUNCH of questions about what Dr. Ana Michalcea is alleging.

1. Isolation - When we talk about supposed viruses and how they've been disproven as real, then the same should apply here; where is the isolation of these alleged nanobots and the observation of them singularly, their mobility, their structure, disassembly, and replication?

2. Salts, metals, water, crystalline structures and "shedding" - Well respected doctors and researchers including Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Mark Bailey and researchers Adam Bigelsen and Josh Bigelsen (who carry on their father Dr. Harvey Bigelsen's work on holographic blood and pioneers in terrain theory) have debunked the theory of shedding (largely purported and pushed by Drs. McCullough and Malone) as well as having shown their own control samples of blood work using common "contaminants" of blood including table salt, heavy metals and even water to show similar and near-exact structures of what is being shown by others like Dr. Michalcea as being alleged "nanobots". The same structures, bubbles, formations and movements are seen as in the supposedly scary pictures and videos of "nanobot" blood samples. This is in direct opposition to those like Dr. Michalcea who allege artificial causes for everything they claim to see in their blood samples, including those who are unjabbed, which is akin to scaremongering and a general sense of catastrophism with only half-proof and half-truth.

3. Blinking lights - So is Dr. Michalcea saying we don't have light in us? Or that our blood reacts with light or possibly gives off light, even as a reaction, even in dark-field microscopy? Fluorescence is not particularly natural in humans but it's not out of the realm of possibility, especially if salts and metals may be present in the blood. This also discounts basic phenomena of a light source (natural or reflective) looking as though it is blinking or quavering in the distance or through a liquid due to simple atmospheric disturbance of rising heat and/or refraction.

4. Rubbery blood, chemtrails and consuming foreign matter - I'm personally not discounting chemtrailing or consumption (ingestion by food or breathing or cellular osmosis) as being able to introduce things, especially heavy metals in sub-micron form to all places throughout the body, including the brain, but that's a stretch to go from the nano-size to the colossal structures of the alleged rubber-blood. It's well established that untreated blood outside of the body exhibits Rouleaux formation (even in samples on a slide), which is literally the stacking, sticking and coagulation of red blood cells, in part by the use of hemoglobin which is produced by iron and allows oxygenation of the cells and normal clotting function via the metalloproteins adhering to each other to stop bleeding. I do agree that IF there is a phenomena of massive blood clotting and rubbery structures in or outside of the body, that it is concerning and an unsolved issue, but it is still not exactly explained by supposed "nanobots" - in other words, what is the function or process that leads to this phenomena? Is it truly "nanobots" or is there some facility of heavy metals perhaps that allow the blood to become rubbery? I don't see this as conclusive proof of the nanobot theory, even as disconcerting as the phenomena appears. I would point to animals and their blood - if shedding is correct and all the nanobots need is blood, the logic follows that all living creatures could have this alleged self-replicating nanotech in them and hence it should be observed that they too exhibit massive blood clotting in and outside of the body; has anyone looked? I've butchered chickens from grass to table on many occasions and have yet to observe anything out of the norm.

5. Clean lab and samples? - Don't take this the wrong way and I'm under the presumption that Dr. Michalcea has the highest standards, but one cannot be certain without asking whether the samples are being prepared properly and placed on dust-free slides or media and no air bubbles are present in every single instance where they allege the sample is proof of nanobots and foreign structures?; Of course, as stated above, many foreign structures in the blood (including those filaments/antennae) could be nothing more than crystalline salts, metals and water that are being misidentified due to an assumption that the nanobots are real and are present - like a self-fulfilling prophesy.

6. I'm not buying any "off-world" explanations for the existence of any of this technology, with the presumption that it is even real; even if it is, why is it that all "super advanced tech" must have come from "reverse engineering" some "alien" tech? Who is to say that the "alien" tech isn't just thousands of years old from Atlantis or Tartaria or some other ancient civilization? This is one of those intriguing questions that is open for endless speculation with no true basis for the reality of the issue at hand or its implications.

To summarize, I find holes in a LOT of what she presents, even if it turns out to be true. My biggest qualm is not even with the ideas presented, but the solutions that are rendered: a plasma machine (which I'd love to have one) that is expensive to obtain except for those who are typically already independently financially wealthy and treatments through supplementation that for the average poor schlep are also unobtainable or at the least, expensive enough to be unsustainable in the long run (potentially hundreds of dollars for supplements each month for God-knows how long).

I don't disagree with supplementation as a course of action at all and some detoxing of mind, body and spirit; But we won't get far if we don't figure out two things: Why our bodies (and minds and spirit) are not aligned and functioning properly allowing for the elimination of the junk going into them and two; That we end this need to have government at all, which creates, promotes or facilitates incomprehensible evil every day.

To close, I just want to leave with one final thought: fuck all governments everywhere. Most of the evil in the world would not exist, nor persist, if not for government. I used to believe in a "limited government", but even that is impossible for ALL government devolves into tyranny, so, fuck government.