The game is a copy of Heartstone arena run. It plans to cannibalize on the same player base for SL which is struggling to keep the game afloat. And it is asking money from the DAO. Sorry can’t support.
We are witnessing how hard it is move our own 500K RB packs. In this environment I can not support another game that drains the same community.
Also the term of the offer is terrible only 15% where our own CEO Matt offered 50% of the revenue.
Regardless; will not be supporting this proposal.
As Jedielf perfectly summarized
A good % of the playerbase are devs. Setting a precedent for the DAO to be a guaranteed Angel investor on un-commercial terms if games involve SPL assets is a recipe for disaster. Every one of these games has to have a separate token in order to generate income, which will drain money from SPL as they target the same playerbase.
I have no issue with that in principle, but not now and not funded by the DAO. Angel investors typically demand much higher % for chunks of cash and tend to micromanage too. The DAO would be a soft touch in comparison
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Splinter Royale