Sure, but I wouldn't do a decay personally, just a flat reduction (and we can reduce further later as needed).
Meh, adds yet another convoluted mechanic IMO.
Fair enough.
Well there's a lot going on. It's not like we're holding our breath and doing nothing. Also on a related note, you know what's interesting is that if SPS price goes up, we'll hear people clamoring for either rentals or reducing the SPS requirements for ranked rewards. So yeah, we could do this now, hope it helps encourage (force?) people to buy, and then hear complaints about accessibility later.
RE: 🧩 SPS Governance Proposal: Implement a 1% Weekly Rental Efficiency Tapering Mechanism