Thank you for your feedback — even if critical, it’s genuinely appreciated. My intention was to design something that isn’t development-heavy and remains simple to implement.
I agree that the initial impact is moderate, but that’s by design: the mechanism favors players who wish to gradually transition from renting to staking without any shocks or abrupt, unfair changes to the current system. It’s meant to guide the economy gently in the right direction, not disrupt it.
RE: 🧩 SPS Governance Proposal: Implement a 1% Weekly Rental Efficiency Tapering Mechanism