I agree, we shouldn't be changing cards after release, especially because the players are voting so. That is very dangerous. Let's not forget that the highest SPS holders can pass or block a proposal by themselves. If this passes, what's stopping them from buying many copies of a weak card (Nomos is a good example), submit a proposal to buff it, pass it, and sell for big profit? I'm not saying they will do that but we also don't know who might show up, buy a lot of SPS, and do that.
That's the worst part but every card game has bad cards. Why are people so focused on one specific weak card? I could imagine people wanting to change a very OP card. Tofu is OP but it's not the most OP card in the game. We allowed Kitty to run rampant for so long without a nerf. A very OP card is much more disruptive to the game than a weak card.
What if they nerf Tofu next? I own a max copy. If they nerf it, it will lose value. Why should I ever invest again just to risk the cards I invest into getting nerfed?
RE: Potential Risks of Adjusting Nidhoggr: My Analysis