Every now and then when I have posted a bit more about topical things, I like to think that it is what I will keep doing. Maybe I can take random things I find interesting and just explore them in a post. From Splinterlands, to the latest "news" on Twitter.
The reality is that none of that is interesting enough, or more specifically always triggers a response.
Sure I could write more about Hive economics and my thoughts on it, or I could write about the latest tech and or social issues.
I could even write about a different thing each day to keep it "fresh" but really... There is nothing out there.
The world is as big or as small as you make it. Mine is like a sponge ball which I expand and crush, and I think that is a good analogy for our personal bubbles. Sure we can expand our views and get caught up in all that is outside ourselves.
More so we could give these broader scopes more merit than we give our own life events or we could pull back. Being soaked with all these interactions and engagements from everything outside of ourselves means it can be very hard to pull back.
Squeezing your world can either be cathartic or traumatic. How much of ourselves is tied to what is happening now, what is happening around us.
I don't know what I define myself by, I do know I can either cringe or be intrigued by people who seemingly do know. Many times it is not even defined, it is just an obsession, the passing fad but what truly baffles me is the level of dedication.
Maybe I am too cynical for such things. I don't like the idea of being so enveloped by something that it might as well be the sales pitch for my life. Oh, you are an artist? Musician? Love crypto?
Good for you.
You care deeply about a single subject and will defend "your truth" till the horses come. Well, I don't. Even if I do, you would not know.
As much as I hold what I truly believe quite close I tend to in equal measure find any inkling of such strong opinions and forms of defining oneself a little bit trite.
Obviously, there are exceptions so it goes without saying that with every judgement a person merely chooses the most statistically appropriate call with the information at hand.
Many times such judgements are quite simple because the person is just clear scum.
Many times the judgements are quite simple because the people are illogical.
Many times all judgements are quite simple because it is not yourself.
So many judgements are done in observation, and it might seem that this removes me from the outside but. I think...
