I am failing to see the added value for Hive from this. We already have several explorers, and not too long ago, a new one (HiveHub from Peakd) started on the same path. This latest version is adding some visual analytics and reports, which is also something HiveHub and Marky's recent proposal is doing. All of them are being funded for the same, if I am correct, so that means more public funds wasted. A collaboration here will save a lot of costs and public money.
On another topic, and this comes from our particular situation, I am sure it is not the same as the whole world, obviously. Why is a budget of nearly 3K per person needed, or are the infrastructure costs that high? Isn't this proposal running a public infrastructure that can be used for the same? @mahdiyari/proposal-public-haf-database-and-hafsql-maintenance
P.S.: Sorry if I sound too direct or hard. I am just trying to find reasons to vote for it, and English is not my first language.
RE: Hive Dev Proposal #2