I think one of the issues with reward weight is how badly it fails at comparison of content from two different time periods. Times when the token was $2 vs the last several months of 12 cents.
It doesn't seem like the reward number can at all be used to sift through and compare content from separate years. Perhaps if we had voting share data instead of final reward amounts that depends on speculative market prices that would be better.
How are you approaching this issue?
Peakd.com is excited to work on totally revamping our search UI and happy that you have a head start on what you're doing while we do a few other things. Happy to see its already getting better.
RE: Hivesearcher summary of work