The final argument with my first court case regarding the polite rape having won the arguments for the two previous legal issues for the two and a half year delay in reporting the crime due to brain surgery and the further 6 months delay in reporting the crime due to fear of radical political correctness and Marxism within the public sector was for me, by far the easiest argument to win. However, it turns out this argument is used by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) against the majority of if not all rape case claims. The CICA argues that the rape was actually consensual sex. Often they win on this claim and the victim loses. I can’t imagine how devastating that must be for victims of rape. Especially since there is such a low conviction rate for rapists.
The CICA might find sentences within the police report to cherry pick on. I think in my case the claim was that I had given the perpetrator my phone number so that was an invitation to have sex. Quite a leap. Quite an assumption. Quite the mental gymnastics. It really is amazing how a government organisation can have such antiquated views while spewing out publicly extreme Marxist ‘politically correct’ views simultaneously. But all that showed me was that the government and legal system in particular can bend and twist its principals in any given situation so as to gain a win.
However, despite their manipulation there is an incredibly easy argument you can play back at these people. It is so easy, so logical that I had assumed all solicitors or barristers would use this as a way of proving the report is real and true. True, a victim can ask the police detective on their case to make a witness statement and I did, but there is an even easier argument to be made. It is beyond me why it isn’t made with every rape case that is denied, but it seems it isn’t and perhaps this is also another precedent set? Again, I’m not sure how easy it is for a solicitor to get away with this. I expect they could though. Surely.
And here was the issue. The CICA were claiming that my report of a rape was false. It was a lie. They were claiming this act was an act of consensual sex. Okay, so they are claiming to the court that they really, truly believe this, that I lied. And they have to convince the court to believe them too, that my police report should not be believed. Fair enough. But here lies the problem. In the UK it is a crime to waste police time. The offence of Wasting Police Time is contained within Section 5(2) of the Criminal Law Act 1967which states:
Where a person causes any wasteful employment of the police by knowingly making to any person a false report tending to show that an offence has been committed, or to give rise to apprehension for the safety of any persons or property, or tending to show that he has information material to any police inquiry, he shall be liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for not more than six months or to a fine.
It would have therefore been reasonable for the (CICA) to report this crime that they believe I had committed in that I had wasted police time to the police. So I encouraged them to do that. I stated very clearly, that they obviously believe I had lied, they therefore must believe I had wasted police time, so I encouraged them to report my perceived ‘crime’ to the police prior to the court attendance so as the police can investigate what the CICA believe to be a false reporting of a crime. I could be arrested, questioned, investigated and if needs be sentenced. And then they will not only prove to be the ‘winners’ of this fight for justice, they will have gotten a criminal banged up in jail. Surely as a public sector authority, a governmental authority, they would be glad to lock up the criminals.
Yes, I played chicken with them. But then, I played chicken with them through out this whole case. Needless to say, they did not report my report of the rape to the police for investigation and my argument was proven. Just like that. Damn that was so easy. And guess what, I proved I ain’t no chicken either. At least up to that point.
I now hope that any victims who are fighting this same battle, who may come upon this blog, will consider using the same logic argument. I hope any of my prior arguments will be used by anyone who may need them. And this is why I spoke up about my fight in court and against the system (sadly only to be heavily censored). I want us to all fight back at these corrupt crooks and build a better future for ourselves and offspring.
I won the case. The court held in my favour. They stated they believed I had been sexually assaulted, that the brain surgery prevented me from realising what had happened for two and a half years, and that political correctness had caused such fear of a possible arrest that I had become very fearful and paranoid around reporting it. They added that I need not be scared in future and that they hoped I would regain trust in the police. Well, they were kind words, however, I will never trust in that system ever again.
Now this case was over and I had won, the CICA would have to award me compensation. They wrote to me offering £11,000 which I declined. They followed up with an offer of £26,000. I declined that offer too. Due to my declining both offers, we were to be back at court. The court would now decide how much I would be awarded. By this point Convid was kicking in and I went off on a tangent at the court. Just prior to the Convid, I had discovered how legally, through case law, the mass migrant rapes taking place across Europe, were in fact genocide and mass rapes had been through an international court before. So I will follow up with those various court cases and discoveries in further articles.