Credits: Humane World End Animal Testing
When people buy a detergent at the supermarket they do a very simple thing: they check the price, the scent, the brand, but almost no one stops to check or inform themselves if animal testing was involved in these products. Because unfortunately, yes, practically every product has passed through laboratories, with exploitation and suffering of defenseless animals.
The European Union has finally introduced a new regulation starting this year, 2026, on detergents, finally introducing a ban on animal testing for products and ingredients intended for domestic and industrial cleaning; full implementation of this ban will take effect in 2029. On paper, it is a very important step: it requires companies to use alternative methods, such as cell models and simulations, which already exist and are often more reliable than traditional tests.
All very good, but the problem is something else. The ban only applies within the detergent regulation, but the same chemical substances can still be tested on animals in other areas under other European laws such as the REACH regulation. Furthermore, the sale of products tested on animals outside the EU is not prohibited, which is instead done for cosmetics. This means that testing can continue, simply moved or reclassified. As complete as it is, the ban is at least not irrelevant since it comes after years of public pressure and demonstrates one thing clearly: when practical alternatives exist and there is a strong and clear popular demand, things start to move. What leaves me most perplexed is: if alternative methods already exist, why still allow exceptions in testing instead of banning it entirely?
References: The EU Tackles Animal Testing for Detergents but Not Everything Is Perfect - PETA France
