¨State of Entitlement¨ Don't just focus on it.

Hello Hivian friends. Happy to be able to accompany another initiative of our friend Hive account@bluemist; A very interesting idea:  , which invites us to give our point of view on something very important that has happened for a long time.

I am almost from the beginning, I got on this train to fulfill my dreams of living independently, or rather, from the ¨compensations¨ of our company; These years of permanence allowed me to see many modifications, the different forks have had their peculiarities; I remember one of them very well, because we received no compensation for almost thirty days; This situation caused many people to leave the train, leaving only those of us who had hope and confidence in our company.

There I knew that I was not here only for the money, this discovery led me to a deep analysis, the conclusion of which was People! I am here because of the human quality that our company houses, they are what motivate every day, especially when my post does not receive compensation, although I love people very much, I have to face the expenses of my home.

The compensations I receive are my greatest source of income, if this is missing, I should rethink my way of living, that does not mean that I would stop publishing, what I say is that I must look for another alternative to earn money.

I came here with a group of friends who were looking to earn a lot of money, at that time there were posts that generated compensation for a dollar value of u $ s 18,000, if you read correctly, eighteen thousand dollars for a publication. Unfortunately I was never that lucky, my first dollar was earned after several months of being here.

As you can read, I included the word luck; To generate compensation, your post goes through a series of ¨argorismo¨ which includes; A lot of dedication + commitment + hours of permanence + luck + type of publication, the sum of all this, is equal to compensation.

I have learned during these years, and it was what helped me to stay for a long time, despite the adversities that we had to go through in each transition; Do not focus only on compensation, it is better to be pessimistic on this issue, if you start thinking that you will not receive compensation, you will not get so bitter if your post is not compensated, however, emotions are great when someone powerful votes your content. If your compensation expectations are high, they will also be your disappointments if you don't meet your goals.

Something that helps me a lot is not seeing the compensation of others, much less comparing them with mine; Remember that the compensation is the result of (a lot of dedication + commitment + hours of permanence + luck + type of publication) Maybe you are luckier than me, or it is a different publication than mine, which makes your audience different from mine.

Another thing that helps me is to focus on my knowledge to make a publication, when I wanted to do something else that I did not know; It went very bad; (That's why the red number that I have marked is due to) I usually analyze the trend posts, there I can see the topics they like, one of them is talking about types of games, or making art; As once, you cannot compare the compensations when the publications are different, mine talk about how to sow, or how to build a piece of furniture with wood collected from the garbage; There is not point of comparation.

There are many unhappy people because they assume that their posts comply with the ¨compensation¨ ¨argorismo¨ (a lot of dedication + commitment + hours of permanence + luck + type of publication). What should be considered that there are not so many healing teams, for so many people publishing In this regard, the best thing to do is to work together with a community that goes with the material you usually publish.

I would make a system so that ordinary people who do not have voting power, can reward the authors through comments; The more relevant the comment, the more compensation for the author.

This value should not be related to the commenter's ¨hive¨ ¨power¨, but to a level of commitment they have in the company; Comments should be limited to about 10 per day, with a maximum value of US $ 1.

This system will not only serve to improve the compensation to good authors, who are being seen or supported by the curation teams, in turn increase the level of commitment of our company.