This is a shot at the cafe I'm sitting in and I think the biggest focus is to look back at one of the cat's eye curtains. I didn't use the phone photos often. Since I got a new phone with a decent camera. So I slipped more into my posts. But not too much, since I still have this constant voice, "I could do better if ..." The back of my head, like the devil on my shoulders, my conscience.
I sometimes wonder if people have some conscience in their online behavior or if digital behavior (especially anonymity) means the moral compass of right and wrong has moved too far away from the consequences of action. In some ways the internet is like a mentality where everyone wears a mask. In a culture where looting and violence are socially acceptable.
The need for self-reflection has also been removed, perhaps due to the disruption of activity from feedback. Because of the physical intimacy with each other that life can provide inappropriately. There is no more "slap in the face" for him. The screen in the interaction probably saved a lot of broken noses. But it also probably reduced the degree to which we need to think about the reactions of others. Instead, we will be encouraged to lose emotional control no matter what the damage, or whether our sensitive response is justified or in an intensity that matches the situation.
Internet is like the extremes of Rodrigues, where people die because they cut someone off the highway. Punishment does not correspond to crime. It seems a bit fun and for relevance. People are willing to take part in destroying someone's profession or life. Because they don't like what they wear. I remember reading shooting stories in ghettos because someone looked at another person incorrectly, or wore the wrong colors.
Okay, probably not in the same physical sense. But the global online community works like a very big city with a lot of different types of people. Those who spend time worrying about things according to their background. Yesterday I was looking at the Hive person and wondering what it would be like to look at the general population of the internet in general based on content? For example - what are the general income levels (local) of a person who reads the content of the investment - high, medium or low?
Of course, all of this data is used for collection, sorting and targeting. But from a social point of view, I am a firm believer in the "what we eat" of life. And I think a lot of us have the condition to enjoy eating shit. As if we have the nutritional value of life. What do we eat? It depends on each of us at least as adults. However, many of us are at risk in one way or another because of what we say in our childhood. Changes make predictions difficult, since we have held this priority for so long it seems natural to satisfy it.
Like food, I think there’s a generalization “something with restraint is okay” when it comes to information. Because there is no information that can cause an immediate change in habit. However, continue to eat from the same source or type of content and it will begin to affect thinking, attitudes, processes and actions so that our habits change and the rate of change may be ultimately variable depending on our starting point. Conditions affect our sensitive balance. Makes us more or less sensitive to influence.
It seems that the Internet has been able to reduce the emotional barriers to anger. Increases barriers to being charitable to others. We don't know if anyone is just spending the holidays. We are ready to tear up these little slip-ups. We certainly hope that other people give us the benefit of the doubt when we ourselves are not in the form and feel victimized when they do not.
However, this is the world we created and if it ever continues to improve. But it is going to take time to shift the paradigm to a social level. But it needs to change first on a personal level. After all, we can only influence what we do and the place to start is with our own behavior. I wonder how people nowadays think about their own moral or ethical position or is it something that is not considered in today’s world. Where no one considers “right and wrong”, since no one has to promise themselves and there are not many results in the way we behave.
I wonder what it takes to rob a store and steal a television. And I wonder what I’ll feel about it once it’s done. Because I will assume that I have to be emotionally charged or desperate. Once the emotion has faded. Will I still be able to justify my behavior? Did the Rodriguez offender regret killing a person for not giving a hint in a lane, or did they maintain that the person deserved it, the response to the action was fair, even in reflection?
Some activities cannot be revoked. But we still have to live with the consequences.
Yesterday I posted the introduction. Please come and see.@toukirahamed02/bangla-english-my-introduction-of-hive-blogchain