Hello friend, This is a question that often comes up, but even after three years of overs, I still don't have a definite answer - what kind of content adds value to the blockchain? Does anyone know for sure? In my opinion, valuable content is content that generates action, not just transactions.
This is because some of the people who read it can be personally involved and interact in a way that makes them think or potentially change their behavior. Which somehow enhances their livelihood. This means that the subject has to go beyond and connect with the reader at the human level with the steps for their consideration. An obvious example of this could be content that positions information in a way that encourages people to use some hive. Needless to say it does.
Unless the person is already interested in increasing their investment and has not already been monitoring the markets. For those who are traveling or are currently reluctant, there is a need for something different for the information and procedures needed. Only in this particular case is it clear that a variety of materials are needed to cover all locations, depending on the audience.
Which usually means multiple posts, multiple approaches and multiple examples.
The entry level is an entrance for the first activity of a sector of the audience. Much more fundamental to other sectors. Although the technical level can be great for those who have a lot of prerequisite history.
This means that not all hive contents, for example, can be the same and should not be classified as such. If we use mathematics to illustrate this, simple addition and subtraction will be very basic for quantum physicists. But they had to start somewhere. I wonder, which level of mathematics is the most important, the necessary foundation for the next level, or the next level that we solve problems as a society.
The results are easy to review and say that the solution to the problem is the ore is more valuable than the basics. But no matter the chicken or the egg, it is impossible to achieve advanced levels without the basics. This does not mean that teaching the basics is always useful.
But combing information means that some of the recipients will continue their work up the ladder of discovery information. Someone could be an engineer in math, someone could be a rocket scientist, which would make us all mentally paralyzed. Although it adds value to Hive's content.
Values can be obtained in exchange for all that content. For example, spam adds value through the organization of community members to fight that through transactions. The abusers of the prize pool add value for the same reason, as communities come together to rally people against it. By doing this they become more widespread in the system and how the infrastructure does not work. People have learned a lot more about how they work.
This does not mean that pool abusers should have a cut - but they can try. We can see written content that gets a lot of engagement and says it has advertising value. But it will not be in any case because it will only add value to the currency. For example if it encourages buying, the partnership, demand and lack increase similarly.
Delivery quality can be a huge driver. If that distribution goes to accounts that are going to use it well, use it to add value. I've often heard people talk about how great content creators have left without showing problems. Yes, we need great content creators. We need a lot more attention on what has been created. There is no value in not looking at work. What Hive needs is a great audience, who come, swallow the content and share it with the world. The issue is less important than reach.
What is the most valuable content?
The more subscribers to the content, the more it will attract creators. This is why the focus should be less on paying for the post. Much more in terms of paying for enjoyment. And yes, the pay through curation is not too high. But where it's not worth it, it's a park. Yes, the value can fluctuate but gradually the number of coins by itself increases.
This means that over time, the consumer locks the content of a content, shares the content and adds their voice through comments. Add value by adding demand to content. This will ultimately drive the demand for tokens, the supply of content creators, and the increased value of the ecosystem. The general subscription model does not return anything to the buyer, but to HIV - this purchase is held as HIV and will last as long as it is operated. This means that a 10 year old customer on HIVE can hold thousands of tokens.
Over the last ten years, however, Hive has become a common source of content. Which is capable of giving all kinds of capabilities to the internet. Because tokens are kept in a private wallet, as a customer invests as an investor - and it can be more profitable over time than many other investment vehicles. It attracts new visitors to the ecosystem. Serves them when they arrive.
I think apps should work very hard to bring in new apps for new apps. However, nothing is easier. As individuals, I think we should probably invite people as viewers of the content. Rather than putting pressure on the creator.
That way, they can enjoy the content, get used to the ecology and culture, and then start posting if they want to. Of course they can also post directly instantly but it depends on them. Most people who use YouTube have never posted a video - yet it is used sparingly.
How is a content valuable?
I still have no idea exactly, what kind of content increases the value of our blockchain. But I think it has to be something that people can enjoy. Offers them something that improves their lives. It’s no surprise that crypto news sees this as a way to increase their wealth. Similarly, the content of the platform is not surprising because it is what people can invest in. When you are interested in something, it makes that thing much more enjoyable. This is not rocket science.
However, this is why as more and more consumers need more and more people become more interested in crypto and things outside of the platform. . As the audience grows, the likes and content creators will be able to create sections for the audience. However, if the emphasis is on earning and that is the main focus, being an audience member is not the best way to go in most cases. There are many causes and a part of these factors that very few people make it long term in the system. Because they spend a lot of time preparing for a potentially absent audience or one that is already thinly spread out.
I wonder how many works that creation is not for them and instead spends their time and is busy on the platform because they like it.This is a long post with no satisfactory answer, but if you make it so far my idea is at least This is good enough to skim. Is it worth it for the blockchain?
After reading this, people are going to depend on what happens, thoughts change in any way, actions are somewhat consistent, are the decisions of tomorrow different in any way? The value of the votes received in the post adds value to me. Like I apply energy to most of what I achieve.
It increases its value to those who vote for it through the Qur'an. But hopefully, it can improve life a little bit. Maybe it's something with valuable content. It's not a list of bullet points, it's not business advice or a photograph and a fairy tale, it's not a post. Valuable content is not at the level of the post, it is at the level of the content where the audience keeps coming back more and more through attraction and consistent distribution and it keeps on purchasing.
A favorite author will sell books to their audience in their past distributions, equal to actors and sports stars. Consistency is valuable.