The thing I'm thinking is, when you're developing a "leaky" vaccine, at what point does it become known that it is, in fact, leaky? If a pandemic is rolling unchecked, as it was before these were developed, some may say in haste, other may say not fast enough. At what point do you decide its in the best interests to stop a "leaky" vaccine if there are no other options, or should it even be stopped? Ultimately there is no guarantees and there are lots of variables that are farther reaching than some isolated birds, when you're talking about the entire planet. I am not saying I am behind the vaccine or against it, I just am not easily assured of any claims, when they are based on limited or minimal data. I certainly am not the type of person to give any government cart blanche regarding the public's anything. But health is generally a thing that every human, regardless of position, has as a common goal, as noone wants poor decisions made resulting in deaths of anyone that could eventually make its way back to them or their families. Pandemics, thankfully aren't a norm, even now, with regards to the stream of time ratio to qualified pandemics. Not to mention, they government relies heavily in such cases on opinions of the health system, and doctors who for the most part again, have a similar goal in seeking solutions to health risks or dangers. So, not to be ignorant or naive, but rather simply trying to be realistic, with awareness to the possibility of imperfection of person and imperfection of moral fiber, also being a playing factor and unknown but known variable. I think its a little early to even begin developing an accurate opinion myself, but that's just my two cents trying to make sense of all the senseless nonsense.

Edit: Just adding that it didn't leave any feeling of certainty of the articles aim when reading your last comment regarding the "New World Aura", as I have not heard of that, but clearly through the response you were making to, it seems at least somewhat known. What I mean is, what effect on your research and/or decision making regarding opinions as they relate to current Governments, does your belief system have on those opinions? Personally I prefer opinions that are lacking influence from any personal belief system, since that tends to imply a possibility of an agenda or ulterior motive that is coming from a perspective that has no relation to the material as it is somewhat presented with an influential impetus due perspective, rather than fact based and a searching for truth at all costs based on the general wellfare of all.