Another one bites the dust.

A local policeman this time. 35 years young, freshly jabbed, heart attack on the job.

There was a 19 year old 2 weeks ago. Heart attack when entering my little town. Smashed his car head on into another. Killed him stone dead, sent the other driver straight to intensive care. He is still in there, fighting for his life.

If it had been 10 minutes, just a mere 10 mins earlier, it would have been me he wiped out on a motorbike.

I have no idea what the as Bill Gates says "secret ingredient" in the jibby jabs is, a secret is just that, a secret.

But I can see that there is no coincidence that people, even the young are suffering heart attacks after getting the prick.
I have noted that 30% of people are getting what they term a placebo jab. Any trial demands that. And this mRNA is admitted by all governments to be a trial.

I am not "anti vax" or anti science. But show me the isolated virus, 20 months and not a single scientist or government can.

Medical fraud has a long history. We are over 100 years into "germ theory" Theory as I keep saying is not fact.

Here for info.

"Dr Stefan Lanka demolishes the ‘virus’ theory and the whole paradigm of ‘modern medicine’ on which the ‘Covid’ hoax is founded " = https://www.defendressofsan.com/blog/dr-stefan-lanka-demolishes-the-virus-theory-and-the-whole-paradigm-of-modern-medicine-on-which-the-covid-hoax-is-founded

I am all for differing points of view. There is no debate without it.

I am also all for experts in their respected fields speaking out against the government narratives.

When companies making these jibby jabs, these little pricks, when they have no liability when it goes wrong, I suggest IMO, we all have one, they have been given free-reign to do anything they want.

By the way, the plandemic book is at number 3 in the charts today :-).

A brief history and link provided, to back up what I write.

"WASHINGTON – In 1986 Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), creating a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in vaccine-related lawsuits and to facilitate compensation to claimants who found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too difficult and cost prohibitive.

The NCVIA allowed for a party alleging a vaccine-related injury to file a petition for compensation in the Court of Federal Claims, naming the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary as the respondent.

The court was required to resolve the case by a specified deadline and then the claimant could decide whether to accept the court’s judgment or reject it and seek tort relief from the vaccine manufacturer.

Awards were paid out from a fund created by an excise tax on each vaccine dose.

However, the NCVIA also provided vaccine manufacturers with significant tort-liability protections and eliminated manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable adverse side effects."

Link = http://sonorannews.com/2017/07/03/vaccine-manufacturers-exempt-liability/

Everywhere is he not, old Kill Bill.

It must make him sleep well. Fingers in pies all over the place. Zero liability.
I could write an entire book about Gates investment in event 201 on-wards from that October in 2019. I may well do so this winter.
Imperial frauds college London, home of the lock down lunatic Neil Ferguson. They get Gates funding.

Here is his plan, just another lunatic.

"Neil Ferguson’s Plans for a Permanent Lockdown of the UK"

"Zap has released the following memo from UK Coronavirus adviser Neil Ferguson. I have no idea of its authenticity so use your discernment (ask your heart).

However if it has truth to it, it should be broadly and immediately circulated. When events and timing are critical, there’s no time to do research. Its authenticity, for now, needs to be considered on a provisional basis; that is, on how credible it sounds to you.

As for a permanent lockdown of the United Kingdom, the British people would not allow it for a minute. The home of parliamentary democracy?

Is this how it’s going to get more topsy-turvy?

I attach below it Magenta Pixie’s Nine on the role of the Hancock resignation in all this. Note that the scenario of a lover visiting during lockdown was used in both the Ferguson and Hancock resignations. It lets them leave with a rap on the wrist instead of a jail sentence."

Link = https://goldenageofgaia.com/2021/06/29/neil-fergusons-plans-for-a-permanent-lockdown-of-the-uk/

I am still more interested in people having the right to travel than being locked up at home.
I am more in favour of sovereign civil rights, no matter what skin we are in.
I am more in favour of people doing what they want as long as they do no harm to others.

So yes, I like people to have freedom to choose.

People say that is a liberal concept. I think not.

I am what they term liberal on some things, I am what people term conservative on other things. I am as complex as the next person. Not 1 thing, not 2, many things all wrapped up into one.

One thing I do promote, will always promote, is the freedom of choice.

I care not what label people choose to use. You have a right to do so.

Just like that picture above, you and I have every right to ignore unjust laws, mandates etc.

I refuse to comply, I always have, I always will, with unjust laws.

No victim = no crime.

A tad of reading if you like.

Synonyms:
Disobeying unjust laws
Resisting unjust commands
Context:

"Any unjust law can be made unworkable by organised public non-cooperation and defiance, as has been shown by so many struggles throughout history. One of the most recent in the UK was the successful mass non-payment of the Government's Poll Tax, leading to its abolition.
Claim:
Abortion and euthanasia are thus crimes which no human law can claim to legitimize. There is no obligation in conscience to obey such laws; instead there is a grave and clear obligation to oppose them by conscientious objection. From the very beginnings of the Church, the apostolic preaching reminded Christians of their duty to obey legitimately constituted public authorities (cf. Rom 13:1-7; 1 Pet 2:13-14), but at the same time it firmly warned that "we must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29). In the Old Testament, precisely in regard to threats against life, we find a significant example of resistance to the unjust command of those in authority. After Pharaoh ordered the killing of all newborn males, the Hebrew midwives refused. "They did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but let the male children live" (Ex 1:17). But the ultimate reason for their action should be noted: "the midwives feared God" (ibid.). It is precisely from obedience to God-to whom alone is due that fear which is acknowledgment of his absolute sovereignty-that the strength and the courage to resist unjust human laws are born. It is the strength and the courage of those prepared even to be imprisoned or put to the sword, in the certainty that this is what makes for "the endurance and faith of the saints" (Rev 13:10). In the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia, it is therefore never licit to obey it, or to "take part in a propaganda campaign in favour of such a law, or vote for it". The passing of unjust laws often raises difficult problems of conscience for morally upright people with regard to the issue of cooperation, since they have a right to demand not to be forced to take part in morally evil actions. Sometimes the choices which have to be made are difficult; they may require the sacrifice of prestigious professional positions or the relinquishing of reasonable hopes of career advancement. In other cases, it can happen that carrying out certain actions, which are provided for by legislation that overall is unjust, but which in themselves are indifferent, or even positive, can serve to protect human lives under threat. There may be reason to fear, however, that willingness to carry out such actions will not only cause scandal and weaken the necessary opposition to attacks on life, but will gradually lead to further capitulation to a mentality of permissiveness. (Papal Encyclical, Evangelium Vitae, 25 March 1995). "
Link = http://encyclopedia.uia.org/en/strategy/207098

Have a superb sun filled week, give a stranger a smile, open a door for one too. Make it a good one.
You never know, it may well come back to you.

Make love not war.

---