@xosome5: It's like this.

It's like this. You know the typical CT range is 25-35.
So, if you want a lot of positive cases, you set the no. of amplification cycles to some high number like 40, which is way above the CT.
And if you want negative results, you set the no. of amplification cycles on the low side, like 28. Not too low, cos people will notice. Easy peasy manipulation right?
waitaminute -- you mentioned OAN, Newsmax, some crooked lawyer... none of which are doctors. Now you're talking about some other expert on some channel...
ok, now I'm curious - who exactly are you accusing of lying, and what exactly did they say that was a lie?
from the video, clearly in black & white, a specific 18 character sequence, from the WHO document, matching with "Homo sapiens chromosome 8". Are you saying its only a partial match?
That chromosome 8 has a longer sequence? Doesn't seem like it to me.
Whatever the case may be, having a match, partial or full, to a human chromosome, still looks damn suspicious.