Have you ever actually studied vaccines, or read a pure statistical analysis of different vaccines and their efficacy and side effect rates?
Your post is essentially just a rant. It's abrasive, dogmatic, uninformative, uninformed, and emotional.
Everyone who has looked in depth at this subject knows there is a large variation in vaccine types and effectiveness. Some help prevent catching a sickness, some help your body fight it once you get sick, others give you a mild case of the disease so your body will have antibodies on hand that can target a more serious infection if you happen to catch it later.
We humans love to oversimplify things, and that is what has happened with the vaccine debate. In reality, every vaccine is different and deserves its own careful study and discussion of benefits vs side effects.
To say "all vaccines are good," or "all vaccines are bad," both are oversimplifications of a very intricate, complicated, and often emotionally driven subject. It doesn't do anybody any good when you just dogmatically take a stand on one side or the other.