The corona phase has taught many lesson. The important being to take prevention at own cost to stay safe from the widespread disease. People were quick to accept the changes in the lifestyle and soon they adapted themselves to the changing condition. However, during the same phase, I have seen people, were hesitant or unwilling to take the COVID-19 vaccine for a variety of reasons. They have multiple conception about the vaccination. Significant fear existed regarding both immediate side effects (aches, fever) and potential long-term, unknown side effects, including infertility or permanent DNA changes. But those who have taken the vaccine were all good and does not shown any side effects.
Whether people should be allowed to refuse preventive care is a complex ethical and legal issue that balances individual autonomy against public health interests. We have seen how disease spread fast in public place. Be it flu, cough or other viral disease. Many individual avoid taking vaccination but some show responsibility to take timely vaccination to avoid spread of the diseases. Public health principles emphasize the need for vaccination and preventive measures to ensure herd immunity and prevent the spread of diseases. Refusing care can lead to higher morbidity and mortality rates, increasing healthcare costs and risks for the community.
I remember my father is against any health check up. He refused to take one as he consider it that any detection would lead to mental stress. But when he was diagnosed with sudden high BP he seems to regret his eaelier decsion. Not taking preventive care (e.g., screenings, check-ups, vaccines) leads to severe consequences. Delayed detection of diseases, development of chronic illnesses (heart disease, cancer), and high financial liabilities from emergency treatments. Undetected illnesses like high blood pressure, diabetes, or cancer (e.g., cervical, colorectal) become harder to treat or fatal.
Decisions regarding the refusal of preventive care such as immunizations, health screenings, or check ups are generally made based on the age, competence, and legal status of the individual. Medical experts maintain that preventive care (screenings, check-ups, vaccines) is vital to stay ahead of illnesses and detect serious conditions early. If a parent's decision to refuse preventative care (like life saving vaccines or screenings) puts the child at risk of serious injury, health officials or courts may challenge the decision. While autonomy allows adults to refuse care, and parents to guide their children's care, the decision to skip preventive services carries risks that are often legally and ethically challenged if they cause clear, preventable harm to a minor.
In good faith - Peace!!
