she might have a valid point (I'll paraphrase):
INSTEAD of theology (despite it being true) concentrate on criminality!
like it or not isl@m is considered a "religion" in UK, it's obvious this "religion" is rooted in global submission, but that's within theological & not criminal domain
lord Pearson: "can we talk about isl@m" is not the pragmatic approach, rather the blatant GOVERMENT UNEQUAL TREATMENT & UNLAWFUL FAVOURITISM TOWARDS MUSLIM CRIMINALS should be the main & focus
another words, once any religion is demonized then automatically all religions are demonized!
For years T❤️R been banging on ",, but the perpetrators themselves say it's their religion to behave like this"; yet time after time it falls on deaf ears, cause the general public will not distinguish between various religions & sees attacking one as attacking freedom of religion itself
that's why I think it's more pragmatic to address goverment bias (dhimmitude) instead of theology
- PiPtar

This comment was made by a guest account using Hive account@steempress. Rewards will be sent to the user once they have a Steem account