Public opinion will certainly produce two important opinions about the context of presidential pardons. These views are diametrically opposite, with one side supporting and the other opposing the existence of this law or regulation.
From the perspective of those who support it, the fundamental question at stake is humanity. This is seen as necessary as a last appeal in cases of processes, errors or unfair legal failures in the law. Thus, it serves as a form of legislation that flexibly adapts the law when it deviates from its intended goal.
However, from the opposite perspective, we can also see the truth in the facts. There is a fear that this law can be abused, leading to a decline in public trust in the legal process, disregarding the voice of the people and indicating overlapping legal institutions.
As a Muslim, I observe and ask how Islam see such a cool concept?
Here, Islam explains clearly and comprehensively that recognizes the existence of a system of forgiveness. However, the context of Islamic law differs because in Islam, the form and authority of the law are not exclusively in the hands of government, but depend on the type of offense and the rights of the victim.
There are three types of law in Islam: Hudud, qisas and ta'zir. In Islam, if we take an example that can/has an appearance of forgiveness, it is only in the case of qisas and ta'zir. However, in the case of Hudud, forgiveness is not possible when proven. Therefore, presidential pardons or forgiveness in Islam is recognized as a principle, but not all punishments can be forgiven. Forgiveness is personal and social, thus encouraging the value of prioritizing forgiveness if it brings benefits.