Something that is true is clearly absolute, which means that it can be questioned again. However, this is not the case when it comes to something for which there is no answer, because it is still being explored or continued to be sought until its existence becomes answered and can be considered absolute.
If it is assumed as described above, it can also be connoted that truth is only for people who think. Where every person who is looking for the right answer will definitely use his mind to get the right answer. So logic is said to be part of understanding to think.
That is clearly the case, and many things can be said to be examples of the part of truth that is only for people who think.
However, there is also a development of things that do not want to accept the existence of truth things only for people who think, usually this is based on the conditions of a situation that masterminds the rejection of the meaning of truth for people who think.
In conclusion, interpreting the meaning of truth for thinking people can sometimes be faced with a dilemma, where the world and its contents are clearly still supported by the existence of understanding and differences even though some absolute and non-absolute things have clearly answered the information of truth.
-===-