Why I Trust Crypto More Than the Banks: A Lifeline in a World of Control and Surveillance

I both love and hate it when some of my so-called conspiracy theories turn out to be true. I didn't invent the concept of conspiracy theories, but over the years, through reading various books and listening to folks like Alex Jones and David Icke, I've become quite proficient at reading between the lines of certain global events.

Since the early days of the COVID lockdowns, I've been discussing with my close friends the hidden agendas behind the pandemic and the true meaning of the lockdown. The mask mandates, which were evidently ineffective, served as a test of how obedient the masses would be in accepting restrictions on their oxygen intake for the sake of reducing virus transmission. Meanwhile, the vaccine rollout was another test, assessing how compliant people would be in accepting "mandatory treatments" (injections).

Some might label me a lunatic, but I'd go even further and suggest that the virus itself may have been disseminated through the use of chemtrails. Wearing masks, no matter how many, would have offered little protection unless individuals possessed a robust immune system. Furthermore, the vaccine campaigns have likely been a precursor to the future implementation of RFID chips.

While the latter may be decades away from realization, figures like Klaus Schwab and his famous quote, "You'll own nothing and be happy by 2030," have become emblematic during this plandemic. The next phases, as discussed in my previous blog posts and those of others, include the global rollout of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and social credit scoring.

These two components are interdependent. To facilitate programmable money (CBDCs), social credit scores are necessary to determine whether someone is "permitted" to make specific purchases or whether they have accumulated enough carbon credits to travel. This dystopian scenario, if it materializes, will significantly widen the gap between the lower and upper classes.

As you can see from the headline of this post, the UK's NatWest bank is already instructing its customers on what to eat and do to reduce their carbon footprint. This would be trivial if society were not on the path to digitization. However, as traditional cash disappears, we are left with two alternatives. On one hand, we have social media apps like Twitter, which, according to Elon Musk, is on the verge of becoming a "global financial app," enabling payments without the need for a bank account. On the other hand, we have cryptocurrencies, which can function as exchange currencies similar to fiat money.

As of now, Elon Musk's statement about X (formerly Twitter) revolutionizing the global financial system and El Salvador's adoption of BTC as a national currency are the only notable developments. The rest of us are largely at the mercy of the banking system, which, as we know, is closely aligned with the elites.

From what I've heard, my country is poised to restrict transfers exceeding the equivalent of $450 in the near future unless they are deemed "purposeful." This means that if I want to lend a friend $700 in my national currency, the banking app won't permit the transaction, likely leading to increased cash usage.

It was initially believed that the traditional banking system, the current societal and economic climate, and other related factors would stymie the success and adoption of cryptocurrencies. However, in my view, these very conditions, which are gradually limiting our freedoms, will be the driving forces behind mass cryptocurrency adoption.

People will begin searching for "better money," and some of the cryptocurrencies at our disposal, such as stablecoins (with HBD being a strong contender), will address critical gaps that the banking system deliberately creates. Eventually, even when selling off cryptocurrency holdings, the traditional route may no longer be viable for me.

I am increasingly inclined to stay in stable assets and utilize decentralized blockchains for everyday transactions, should that become a reality. I don't trust the banks; I resent the banks, and I don't believe they have the right to dictate what I should eat or how much I should travel. What are your thoughts on this?

Thanks for your attention,
Adrian