The banksters / corporations are trying to buy up all the real estate. T.H.E.Y. want everybody on the plantation. T.H.E.Y. think they can buy it all up and then rent it to the people, forever.
Basically, T.H.E.Y. feel they can double dip, with everyone just going along with it. Now you will pay the govern-cement AND the banks, forever. (no one leaving the system buy paying off their mortgages)
However, as T.H.E.Y. tighten their grip, more people slip out. Actually, it is more like, as T.H.E.Y. they tighten their grip, the more their hand falls apart.
The way we portion out land is bad. It is basically, first come, first served. So, the children have less to choose from, and their children will have nothing to choose from. And, we will recognize that "first come, first served" is a really evil way to do land ownership. And the entire idea of "Real Estate" will be found wanting.
The very ideas of land ownership will change. I know this post will rankle a few anarchists, but it must be done. Telling people accurately the changes coming in the future will help them adjust before the changes are upon us.
How is land portioned out?
Property rights, or the basis of real estate, is incredibly distorted. And now that it has gone on without break for a while, we are seeing how the system is not good for any length of time.
Today, we use a system of "i got here first". And this might be ok if people died and the property was then available to people who came after. (Especially children, who were excluded, by the laws of physics, from "getting here first")
However, the elite combined two evils to make a bigger evil. Corporations could hold land. And corporations never die. So the land would never go back into the system for new comers to acquire. AND THEN! The elites created fractional reserve, debt based, fiat currency. And so, now, with the flick of a pen, the banksters can buy up all the land. They do not have to sell off any land for lack of currency. Basically, they will end up owning all of the land, and then demand we pay rent just to live.
Although, someone has already claimed all the land. The govern-cement. And if you do not pay your rent, they will take the land back. (Except that corporations seem to get a pass here)
This "i got here first" paradigm does not work well.
People's needs should be the map for the ownership paradigm.
Discussing this becomes very tricky, because people go from one extreme to the other.
As in, about half believe in absolute land ownership, and the other half believes that everyone should share.
Absolute land ownership leads to our children having to leave Earth to have a place to live. Although there is plenty of space (if you leave the cities) for everyone. Billy Gatez will not legally have to give up all of his farmland. But, he owns so much that if he stopped the farming on it, we would have serious food shortages. Sooo, the future may see people just taking over his land (squatting) or removing his head and claiming the land now that it is "un-owned".
The other side, thought CHAZ was a good idea. To hell with those people who bought those properties as a place to live. And those tenants who were renting apartments there. The thing is, that finding a place and staking it out, and being moved on by more powerful people, is "natural". It is what bears do. It is what wolf packs do. However, it is not something farmers can do. If the people who are growing food do not have a strong notion that the food will be theirs for harvest, then they will not plant. So, the way of "everyone finding their place, and no one owns anything" ends up in starvation. (as many socialist/communist paths do)
However, we are humans, and can reason. We have all kinds of self organizing systems that we can adapt from. If we are nomadic, or follow the herd, or stay in place farming, we can negotiate with other tribes.
Our current system will have everyone renting from the banks AND the govern-cement. And the people will own nothing.
The Future?
The banksters/corporations are planning to own all the land. And they are focussed on buying up all the suburban real estate.
However, the future looks like it is going to be small communities / tribes / "families", and these small communities will be located in areas that have good protection from weather, and good for growing crops. In other words, not in cities / suburbs.
Further, these communities will have space around them. A buffer. People can walk around the area that the "family" calls theirs. Unlike how we have tiny properties and build all the way to the line. The buffer will save on border skirmishes. If there is a buffer, than we don't feel that we have to defend the border so much.
The property under the community will not be for sale. No "person" could buy it and kick the people who are living there off. The land will NOT be real estate (not owned by the king, or the banksters, or the govern-cement). We will have some other name for "the land where we live and grow". And it will mean just that. If the people, or person, who is there is not takeing care of that land (growing, making it better) then it can be said that they do not own that land.
Ownership of land will included maintenance. And not maintenance by some group, or corporation paid to "maintain" it, but you, the "owner" care-taking the land. (so if a group is hired to maintain the land, the ownership may be seen as that group, not the ones paying. So long Billy Gatez)
Real Estate, the old definition and the new definition, will die a horrible death. The king/crown/govern-cement DOES NOT OWN THE LAND. It will be owned by the group maintaining it. (and yes this means that some group trying to take over another group's land will mean war, like they are two small countries)
We will not be atomized like we are now, with each nuclear family, and now each divorced father and single mother owning a house and a tiny piece of land. It will instead be a group / tribe / community / "family" that collectively owns the land. And their claim to ownership is them maintaining it / improving it.
Corporations will not own any land. The people actually doing the work to maintain the land, will own the land. Even if the corporation is paying them to do so. It will not be allowed for someone to own land that they are not maintaining. Basically, the corporate fiction will be pierced. It will not be the corporation, the name, the fiction, it will be the actual people who will be seen as the owners, and those responsible for their land.
Polluting will be considered a high crime, where people will "go to war" over. Actually, it won't be war, it will a lot of people not dealing with the polluters. And if that doesn't work, it will be a lot of people coming and dismantling the thing causing the pollution, and then carrying it off. (yes, even mines will be responsible for pollution. And we will see very clean systems created for mining)
Buying real estate is buying into a dying system. There won't be much longer to buy and then rent (invest in) real estate. So avoid that, and you may want to get out of that industry. (some people may do better to ride that investment into the ground)
However, getting a homestead started, buying land for that will be a really good thing. The whole tribe / community / "family" thing will take a while. Not that long, generationally speaking, but years, maybe decades. So, unless you have a group right now, getting out of the city and onto a homestead will be a good plan.