Imagine a world where war mongering was seen as a giant sin, and those who instigate it, or try to sell it, would be seen as enemies of humanity. I'm looking at you CCP, and you Fox "News"
All Wars Are Bankster's Wars
It will become apparent to most of the people that all these wars we are fighting were set up long ago by a small group. And that, not the wars, but the small group has to be stopped. We will not see a war monger on the TV and think, we should vote that person out, we will instantly brand them a warmonger, and most people will stop listening to them. They will be warned, like a father warns his children not to steal. If they continue with their war mongering ways, they will find themselves hanging from a lamppost.
And this will be economics based reasoning. This will be future(s) based reasoning. Not based on squiffy moral arguments.
The morality becomes clear
"War is not good" is pretty much the same "goodness" as "We have to defend ourselves"
So, people can easily be persuaded through false flags that we have to defend ourselves.
But, what if we took a stand that this is economically shtupid? What if any negotiation (in fairness) is seen as a huge boon to the world's economy? As in 4 > -1. War is seen as a huge negative.
Our deals today are done in such a way as to "win", like the two sides were at war. Trump is fighting with the CCP with tariffs. Because the CCP has been using govern-cement printed money to give their manufacturing a competitive edge. Neither side should be doing this.
In the future, the world-wide-interwebz (not the internet) will be use to share all the information. Imagine if The US and China had to pay for everything in bitcoin, and then, everyone could see exactly what was being spent, and could see where all the corruption was.
We will become mostly self sufficient. And this will allow us to stop trading with anyone when we find that they are being bad trading partners.
And things will get better and more transparent, and people who actually care will be in charge. Morality will be enforced because it is economically better.
How to deal with bad guys?
Well, the first step would be to not create more bad guys. In that first step, we work out how to meet everyone's needs. This is not a "lets give them all food" type of answer. We need to work out ways to make sure everyone has land to grow food and water to keep them growing.
With our current technology, we could easily do this. (but there are certain evil people who want to keep the people controlled through always being on the edge of starvation) With future technology, like free-energy and rivers-in-the-sky, it will be stupidly easy for us to see that everyone has the ability to grow food just about anywhere on earth.
Then we get rid of advertising! That stuff that makes everyone feel not good enough, feel incomplete, and that if they just had more stuff, they could be happy. Just like we banned alcohol adverts on the telly, we must also ban these brain manipulation tactics. Mental manipulation is evil.
After the needs are met, and the evil brain programming is stopped, we need to focus on the number one reason people are in prison. And it is not because they are black. It is because they were raised without a father in the home.
All of these society destroying problems are not just a little tied to fatherlessness, they are all over 70%. As in, if you control for fatherlessness, race isn't even a blip in prison population.
Really, what should we do if we found one thing caused suicide, especially male suicide, to jump 90%? Do you think we should be working hard to fix that one thing? However, all the laws are on the other side pushing for it.
In the near future, there will be no single mothers. Because the child will be seen as belonging to the community / tribe. (yes, the community will be invite only, and so the woman will have to apply to join and be accepted.) The community is the ones who will have to deal with a children that grow up to be bad people. They are also the ones who provide the resources to feed and shelter the child. So, the mother can leave, there is no stopping her, but she will leave without her child. And really, it will not be considered her child anymore.
Raise children right. Teach them how to provide for themselves. Make sure they have the resources need to feed themselves. And we will have much fewer bad people.
How to deal with the bad people we have now
Imagine that a corporation was polluting, stealing all the water, or selling poison disguised as food. When people can choose another provider, then once it is known, that polluting corporation will find itself with a serious lack of customers.
And, if this corporation continues polluting, even after boycotts, even after negotiation, then the people will have the right to defend themselves. And many people will descend on this factory and fix it. Apply the filters needed. Make the process better. Upgrade the factory to produce no pollution or better. (and yes, this would have been offered in the negotiations)
If this doesn't work, then the entire area, and all the people therein will be shut down. The CEOs will be hung from lampposts. A group will be authorized to try to convert the rest of the people into those who will be good honorable people.
(Not sure how we will punish those who continue to do bad. But it will probably be something like putting them in a walled, single person farm, where they can live out their lives, and they will be shot/shocked/netted if they try to leave. We will have that kind of technology, and probably better)
We will need to set methods were we find people who don't have warm empathy (psychopaths) and make sure they never get into power. This will not be the internet name calling that we see all over the network-media we see today.
People who are doing evil will be stopped. Like China selling bad fentanyl. It will be stopped first, and then stopping the evil people second. It will not be the slow process of courts we have today. It will be look into, studied, and decided if what is happening is evil. Then it will be shut down. Like, no one buying any Bay-santo products the next day.
All of this really happens for financial reasons.
Consumerism based on cheap, disposable products will be seen as destroying the environment and the economy. Like, people will see very quickly, that this is just throwing money (energy and labor) away.
War will be seen as shtupid, financially. A win-win negotiation will create way more abundance. Like:
- 1 + 1 = 4 Win-Win (and better)
- 1 + 1 = 2 free market
- 1 + 1 = -1 War (or worse)
and no one will accept anything less that 4 from their labor.
You could say that with transparency in govern-cement will allow us to see just how much war costs, to each individual. And then we will put a stop to it at the point we start noticing we are losing money. (That -1 will show up like a beacon)
We will no longer tolerate destruction of our economy like that.