I followed her work and analyzed her video presentations without allowing my bias to take over. I agree with the major points you've outlined in the above posts. I don't think you are wrong in presenting a defense of your friend Derrick.

I am making an effort to go beyond the personal attacks and accusations of being controlled opposition. From this perspective, I've concluded for the most part it boils down to ideological differences and quotidian trivialities. I don't intend to downplay the seriousness of this discussion...which is why I find it disheartening that a meaningful resolution did not come about.

I was blocked by McDowell on twitter for directing her attention to consider some other alternative explanations about Cardano's involvement in Ethiopia. Since I had that interaction (or lack thereof) between her and myself...I know that you are correct in pointing out her unwillingness to have an open discussion with the "other side."

My point of interest in this is not to defend my position in crypto or support an ideologically aligned ally...rather to create a meaningful discussion between opposing parties. The onerous lies with McDowell because of her penchant to block, delete and sidelined opposing discussion.

I will attempt to be a bridge of understanding between the opposing camps. They are far too many people who believe prepackaged narratives: crypto all good, crypto all bad. I hope I can help in a meaningful way to further the discussion.