The way that Khal is going to get the token price to go up is to generate ad revenue off content on leofinance.io and then use that revenue to buy/burn LEO.
The idea is that these buy/burns will eventually outpace inflation emissions of LEO being paid to new content creators as rewards, and as such, supply/demand will push price up.
So all that matters is driving maximum traffic to any and every page on leofinance.io.
In my case, there is older content I had published at other Hive domains which I had referred to on occasion; I can rectify that by publishing updated posts here.
Just gotta figure out whether doing that would generate ongoing traffic for leofinance.io?
Would Google rank those new pages that you re-published, or would they view them as copies of content that is already hosted on another domain and indexed by Google?
That still leaves the sticky issue of image hosting (currently, not at leofinance.io). I have an idea for handling that, but it may not fly with the dev team or with ownership.
Remember, unlike the value of the HIVE token, the value of the LEO token doesn't come from decentralisation.
All that matters is that Google indexes the leofinance.io page and therefore the traffic views ads.
Where the images displayed on those pages are hosted, doesn't have a huge impact on SEO.
RE: Is the concept of ‘valuable content’ subjective?