Some people do opine this way that how much you work for money, it will not be in your side unless you try to let it grow by yourselves.
I have felt the same for most cases when looking at some of the business operations and large industrial corporations. Two cases arent the same.
In any field of enterprise whether its about to building up own portfolio of crypto token or in search of the entity to invest there has to come across a budget. It is the log book that would bear where and how much revenue are you going to spend and the possible sources of supply would come from.
In the previous post I described how capitalism really helps a group of people or a solo person to gather much wealth and the policy conformity that helps to build up and compile wealths. In actual scenario we get to see a company that was established a decades time ago, with the timeframe got to a standard where it holds $Billion revenue as gross worth including profits and capital.
So where is the added amount of money that is coming from ?
Looking deep into the activities, business transactions, monetary cycle and the rewarding system of the employees with stern budgeting policy is what let it to grow with such a big calibre. Most of the time when a newly joined business owner or group of them try to start a business somewhere, in common trades or crypto yards, potentially when they start to see losses, they start to complain project performances.
That is partially true or in some cases falsified. Blaming on performances, basic transactions starting from opening up first trade, trying to hold a bit long and with selling policy at 30%-40% profit - holders start to sell the half of what they stocked at resources. If the agency policy isnt right, then how can they expect to blame performances ?
Thats why I try to view that way that, in the capitalistic world everyone should have a clear concept of how the market is spinning and moving on to. If it favours the retailers, those who build in smaller calibre, with an example in crypto space like, 10-12 ETH per month and then slowly building more resources and capital to move on ; there the large traders might see little profit which could be unsatisfactory at long run.
In that case, someone should point to change the business standards because no such visible profit is on display. At least I dont see the point to stay in some point where the future would look unsettled and if price of the entities start to dissolve and fall down, even capital would start to shade and in that case, stocks will be lost.
That has happened to many users in practical terms. Because when someone with little successful experience in their bags start to jump big, with more uncalculated attempts go for a bold step - when market parameters suddenly cashes in as flash floods, only hands in heads is what gets to see.
The examples are many in that cases.
It all comes down to taking calculated steps, when we want to see improvement, starting small is the option. But experience would determine whether where out of a raw investment will it foster to bring more revenues and secure a position in the ever changing dynamics of capitalism.
Its all are happening and no one wants to be unprepared and out of wit in the middle of financial operations.