Designed by mrhive001 using canva
Hello Hivans
One thing about life is that CHANGE is constant. The change might be from good to better and then best, or it can also be from best to better and then good, which drives back to bad and worst, but one thing is constant: change is constant. This can be applicable in our everyday lives, both in business and also by not leaving technology outside of the equation, as Web3 is included in it.
Content creation, being one of the core practices on hive blockchain, has been done for several years both in and out of blockchain, as social media and mere movie acting can attest to. It has been and will continue to be, but as time goes by, the way, pattern, and route through which content creation is done are upgraded for the better as so many ways and mediums are employed to navigate in content creation and hive blockchain in a day to record contents created in large numbers.
Most communities on the Hive blockchain do record more content being published than others, as the number of subscribers gives a clue to that. Sometimes what determines the number of articles published in a community or how active and busy the community is includes contests in which the winner goes home with something bountiful if the community regularly upvotes 90% of the content published, if that is possible, and also the token behind the community. From my knowledge, the points above interpret the way contents are published in a community, but could that be all, as that isn't the wholeness of content creation? If so, then what?
Content Creation is More Versatile than Before
The driving force through which content creation became more versatile started when the owners of the platform through which the contents were published decided to share the revenue generated from those contents with the creators or posters of those contents. This is the genesis of massive content creators emerging, which was not seen before, as everyone wants to have their own share of revenue too.
Yesterday I was watching a podcast on Facebook that was done by a committee of content creators, and one of them made a statement that was a takeaway for me. He said that it is actually the viewers or audience a content creator has that, at the end, pays his or her bills. I reasoned about this for some time, and I understood that this is actually true. In addition to this, that is another reason why the owners of the pages through which contents are shared plead with the followers to like and share what they have just read or watched, and in the process, more popularity is gained for the page if the fans actually share those contents, and the payout to the page owners is increased.
So at the tail end, the driving force behind the versatility of content creation is revenue generated, and as there is a massive troop of people in the world of content creation, this continues to go on and on.
Leofinance Creating a Difference in Content Creation
I would strongly testify that when Leofinance broke through the tortoise's shell, that was when they came up with the idea of building a whole new interface. The Everything App, which is the name given to the interface, has been the pacesetter for the revolution of a whole method and medium of content creation.
This dream became a reality not even when the interface was in the making or being built but rather when THREADS was integrated. Threads birthed a whole new idea of content creation on the hive blockchain at large, as it is open to all hivans.
Through threads, all hivans can now take their journey of content creation to a whole new level, in addition to the fact that their revenue generation is increased beyond the normal writing of content and publishing alone.
I can also testify to the fact that the features added on the new interface which makes it more awesome didn't come as an inclusion to the aforetime set plans but also came during the process of building and developing the interface as boss 
Leofinance is changing the way content creation is done through
[a]
Integration of threads in the new interface as people no longer focus on creating long-form contents alone as the stress is much lower compared to what is seen on threads. On threads, the contents published are brief, straight to the point, precise enough, and also put the audience at ease.
[b]
The revenue generated in content creation is also increasing as people no longer base their rewards on long-form contents alone but also on short-form ones too. One can equally decide to be more active on threads here on leofinance and publish short form contents, receive the upvotes that come along with it, and equally draw more attention to himself as the threader might decide to start a channel such as i need, also boss 
[c]
Here on leofinance getting rewards is no longer a one way traffic stuff in the sense that on a normal community long form contents, rewards are dependent on the #curator of that community coming with the curation trail to upvote a post and in the absence of the curator coming, no much upvotes on that content because to an extent, the curation trail offers the much greater upvotes. Or the content might receive an upvote when one with great hive power upvotes the post, which might be rare too. But now, rewards are gotten from no direct person as anyone at all can set his or her upvote % and upvote making it more decentralized the more.
[d]
Short form content is now being used to publicise long form content. According a post published weeks back, one can create a #threadstorm about a long form content he/she published in the normal community, add tags relevant to the post and not leaving tags like #outreach and #posh behind. With this, one might receive upvote in the long form post as curators browses through threads and might find that threadstorm worth upvoting.