Hello my hive friends
I hope you are well. I am also quite well. The topic I am going to discuss today is free speech. I hope you like it.
A few days ago I was wondering how far different social networks have gone. I have heard various commendations from friends that their social media accounts are used for a few days on accounts like Facebook and other media, for the words they share.
While it’s true that there are sensitive people, it’s also true that social networks are something personal that you can choose whether or not to follow a person. Nowadays it is common to find black humor, which was also on the printed tablets before it came on the internet. So I decided to ask them: Have you ever been banned from a social network? Why did you get this ban?
These were just a few of the many responses they gave: for content related to their sexual orientation, for sharing to suggest political issues, and for something very common. But clearly it was in a sarcastic sense and it is normal for Canadians to joke about our situation, our country or our problems. Because it is an easy way to deal with tensions.
Others complained of having censors. When they sometimes feel overwhelmed with pictures on the internet and yet they never criticize people or pages, they just stop following them and live it in a normal way. Because they understand that there are, and may be, differences of opinion. So they complain because other people make fun of things that are serious to them and they don’t allow others to mock at certain levels of sensitivity. I really liked it a lot, so I tried to decide to investigate my personal cases among my acquaintances and get my own opinion.
What does free speech mean to you?
This ability, which is our intuition to the world as our human being, our best and worst side and not only that, can also condemn when something goes wrong and you want the world to know it.
Humanity has always wanted to maintain the standard of perfection and control, where minorities have been marginalized and persecuted on a large scale in various fields of history.
People with beautiful skin, who live in dictatorships, children who have been raped by priests by the church, women who have been displaced as objects and not as capable people.
- Although we have gone on to free ourselves from this discipline over time. Above us comes the search for a society that sees itself as the perfect person on the network.
It's gotten so bad that they've blocked users from saying, Delta Amakuro doesn't exist,it's someone who says, New York doesn't exist and is silenced by it, we all know that New York exists and we don't want to bother Because a user makes a joke that it is not true. Because he does not know and does not know anyone from there.
What is a Social Network?
Isn’t this a place where people end up with different behavioral sensitivities so that people can get to know them and show them to the world. If not, how can they find things that are similar to them? The line separating morality and freedom is very thin and smooth.
The world is relentlessly changing. If we talk about this “century of inclusion”, how has it become one of the more restrictive people?
The sensors are designed to not hurt the sensations. The idea is, however, that it comes down to preserving the moral rules of what is good. Now, when we talk about what is morally right, we enter into a duality. Since it and its laws have changed. So shouldn't it be the most acceptable society?
But if it is approved within the most accurate and successful television platform, why has he been approved for one month via the content I have accessed from my Facebook account?
Do you believe that free speech is worth saving? If yes, why do you believe it is important?
I think that freedom of expression is something personal and it includes us. People deserve to talk and be independent. Everyone will get the cross and consequences of their opinion, but this is something that the user must decide and what are they aware of when sharing their content?
I support freedom of expression and convenience. This is because I do not support the person who personally attacks others on the networks, just put pressure on them. However, I fully support that you can create both your own profile and your content:
Which looks best to you without censoring it. If you are not attacking anyone and you are a little bit dark, this is your problem, and if you do not take any action other than your response.
you may be able to bear the consequences of your actions by seeing the response from other users. But it must be your decision. If you decide that you share women in short clothes, and there are children on social networks.
It is also true that it is the responsibility of parents to ensure parental control, and the user decides who sees their content, so if they have a personal profile I have your I see the need to remove access to my own account.
- Censorship is like an elastic band, it extends as much as we allow. As it expands more silently, and there are fewer and fewer social networks that let you really be yourself. Does he want to share his nudity with the world because it seems art.
It’s her body, let her do it. Is he joking about his own problems to avoid stress? Ok Did he decide to let the world know that he was miserable and that he could not really see the meaning of the world? Well, it seems like a better idea for me to offer professional help than trying to use your own profile.
How do we know if someone needs help if we don't ask them?
We say it encourages the other person.It goes into a dark background, we don’t censor through our thinking. We will not contribute to the acquisition of investor resources by these organizations in the selected sectors of these organizations and volunteers. For its philosophy and marketing. They invest heavily in advertising on these networks, so they must control the algorithm.
We make the mistake of believing that social networks are personal forums or decentralized platforms. So if we do not follow the path chosen by the chiefs and the worldview of what they want to achieve, we will be rejected.
It's not worth fighting on centralized platforms because you know the rights you have. Since you should not be told how to think or choose a word. Say it, there is happiness or hatred in your heart. Pass it on No one has the right to say what mold is appropriate.
They don't care about user safety, they choose what they care about. Such images are not able to sell. It’s about money like most things in the world. Independence is accepted as long as economic fluctuations continue. When you do not fill their pockets from the majority sector and it is not accepted by them, it will be censored.
I’m glad there’s a platform like Hive, where your opinions can be heard, respected or debated. The user simply decides whether or not to follow you. You can be yourself because there is no mold to follow. I think they want to force you to consume you by breaking the chain of freedom of expression that the global marketing system has created.
I think we have a long way to go to awaken the masses and separate ourselves from the system they operate as pastoralists. But I believe that as many of us have seen the light, we can help others enjoy the world of freedom and autonomy.