Wow, this post generated a lot of heated arguments and controversies alike and I really can't go through all. Kudos to for taking out his/her time to reply.
However, it's all relative. People more likely to shrug, brush off and accept the 50% beneficiary are mostly those who don't get voted anywhere else (as PH tries it's best to vote every post made in community) or fanatics.
I must say, on hive in general i see wonderful contents getting between $1 - $5 (on a favourable day, some don't even get to the $1 margin) payouts, pathetic! and then I see a post with less than 30 words getting ten times over(hive's becoming more of steemit in the long run).
I love projecthope. Always been together from the start but I definitely don't buy the idea of a 50% beneficiary.
The sad truth is no one gives a damn about content curation anymore, we're probably just here to blow some steam and make some cash.
RE: Warning, please don't encourage the self-voting/vote-selling of the @ph-fund initiative