I do not hide the fact that I took information from third-party sources. In particular, I needed technical information describing the characteristics of buildings and historical facts.
Since the sources are Russian-language, and my English is not perfect, I use the Grammarly program when translating.
In addition, an indisputable fact is that if you use different translators (Google, Yandex, Promt, or Deepl) for the exact Russian text, you will get a different(not identical) English text. (depending on the text)
You say that I changed my text. Yes, it is. These are the requirements of the new rules (point 3 of the architecture and design community rules) that I did not know about before. This is a requirement that I could not ignore, and I had to correct the text. This is also a fact that can be easily verified.
I do not deny that I take information from outside sources. But not to engage in fraud, but to convey reliable information to the reader and not invent non-existent facts. I visit various cities in Belarus and spend a lot of time photographing architecture for the architecture and design community. All these photos belong to me. Apparently, I did the wrong thing by borrowing part of the text from open online sources.
Sorry if I offended you with this. I didn't do deliberate information crimes against the platform.
Let me know if it is possible to remove the blockade from my account.