I will quote you in two parts:
"certainly not a bunch of people, judges in the title, being misled by politicians and self-interested clerics and opportunists." - This is exactly what they said. They should not be the arbitrators of that kind of a life decision.
Abortion is not in the Constitution so there for it is relegated to the individual states. Those kinds of decisions should be made closer to the individuals home.
"Only the mother!" - Not true at all because it takes two to make the third. The father has just as much rights and responsibility as the mother. It should be a decision made between the two of them. One individuals rights do not supersede another. Women are EQUAL to men.
If the mother decides to keep the child and the father doesnt want it he should have the right to give up all responibilty. Including child support. But that isnt at all what happens in this country. Men are usually forced to give up 50-75% of their salary for 18 years whether they waive their parental rights or not.
Not very equal now is it?
I honestly dont see where all these people are saying they took away women's rights. This was probably the single biggest equality decision the court has made in 100 years.

As for the "Throughout all stages of pregnancy there is a dialogue between the mother and the consciousness of the future baby" part. You do know that during an abortion the baby actively flees the doctor with a fight or flight response, correct? That seems to be a pretty basic "human" trait.

Abortion is a major surgery and typically causes massive mental trauma to the mother and the immediate family circle including the father. And is it really worth it for 10-15 minutes of sexual satisfaction?
The decision was correctly made that an abortion should be made at the local level and not federal.