Using arguments based on an old history book specific to one culture, where a religion was born out of - CHRISTIANITY.

Did you know that it was christianity that made women the secondary gender because your image of a god is a MAN and that a WOMAN (Mary) was only used as a tool through immaculate conception, a concept that was scientifically impossible in that time setting. And from there, women HAD TO be covered in clothes to be called modest. But why is it that Spanish priests were the ones to introduce rape culture, taking advantage of fragile Filipinas? Sucks to say this, but please learn fact from fiction, history from hearsay.

Our ancestors weren't clothed. They were covered in tattoos, not veils. But they didn't rape their women because her breasts were exposed. They respected her. They treated her as an equal member of the society.

And when you committed wrong doing, stealing or perhaps rape if there was any, you get banished from the tribe for life. You get blamed for all the misfortunes of the tribe. That's why our ancestors were afraid to commit crime. Compare that to our society now where rapists are able to walk free and people like you Hive account@kennyroy actually defend them. People like you blame the victim. Would you blame Apo Whang Od for posing nude? Because that's her culture as a Butbut Kalinga tribeswoman?

Another thing, you call your church leader a pastor, which means you're a protestant, right? There are at least 7 main denominations of protestants, and probably thousands of other minor denominations. You guys broke off from the belief of Greek Orthodox , of Roman Catholics, and Church of Constantinople but your root was all based on a single MAN god and a WOMAN tool. The fact that you christians yourselves are arguing already shows how inconsistent you guys are. Educate yourself on that please.

Just a piece of advice dear, STOP BITING OFF MORE THAN YOU CAN CHEW.