There are organizations that are leaning in the same direction, including social investment, which is no longer a personal matter but is combined and shared with the responsibility of others.
Today's topic will deal with corporate co-responsibility, starting from the fact that the concept itself establishes co-responsibility as the integration of each of the decisions taken in the different companies.
Internal social responsibility from a vision of co-responsibility, envisioning a corporate position linked to the belief in ethical values that guide the business conduct of each company and the relationship developed for its environment.
Some authors suggest that co-responsibility policies should consider the following elements: company commitment, voluntary decision, benefits for society and the public interest, ethical conduct, environmental performance and adaptability.
Co-responsibility strategies serve as promoters of organizational change and make the competition have to change at the pace imposed by the company, and also allow organizations to be more competitive by complying with internal social responsibility processes.
The above leads to take the contribution of authors such as Hellriegel, in which organizations must assume the commitment of co-responsibility for the fulfillment of the demands that emanate from society, to promote satisfactory changes according to the demands that are presented to them, allowing them to be more competitive.