their tokens are kinda dead for years, could be one of the worst tokenizations on hive, I think with blocktrades vote all these project don't need users anymore, don't care about users much, are allowed to fail, i doubt blocktrades even know how to check their tokens, ignorance is epic. their token pool on engine have liquidity for 400$ when they ask for 230$ daily from hive. Rewarding users is clearly not a point here but milking dhf...
Look how with time whole thing changing towards infra and meeting blocktrades expectations just to save their jobs. If first proposal was about their application next proposal was about infra and onboarding, now they removed onboarding as we all know it's fake idea, no one really knows how to do it and maybe it was previous blocktrades expectation but he kinda learn very slowly...
every next proposal have less votes, is it normal for successful proposal?
I think they already already have another proposal for haf infra, taking 300-400$? more for something they did here previously for 230$? why this split? is it one of the simplest to recognize issues with centralized uneffective governance? it becomes super weird what you people do...
WEAK
RE: Actifit Proposal #3 - Collabs, Development, Infra & Growth