They are simply acknowledging the fact that the rate at which carbon is being emitted into our ecosystem has to be checked in order to mitigate global warming and its dire consequences.

There is no science to back up this hypothesis.
Historical data and cycles suggests nothing of the sort.
(co2 has been much of much higher concentrations with more abundant life).

I think Co2 is also shown to be lagging indicator - correlated with solar activities

The more important question is:
Why do you choose to believe proven liars? (government institutions , and research funded by governments).
We know they lie...

Isn't that stupidity /naivety/gullibility ? ...To choose to believe those very institutions that choose to lie and deceive you, numerous times?