Hello Hivewatchers, thank you for the reply. According to the previous image which I guess you deleted or edited, you made certain points that is still a concern when it has to do with Artificial intelligence and Science related contents like this.

Your analysis mentioned a few things and I will like to pick them one after the other.

Your first point mentioned the post being well organized and then I ask myself if my comment on this post isn't well organized or does it mean it is an AI generated comment? I am writing about Placebo and I was going to explain to my readers who might have not heard the word before and so it would be wrong for me to not explain to them what they need to know. The first point also mentions that I cited my work and it is surprising that you used this criteria to judge a stemsocial post where one of our criteria to make a post is to cite references for whatever post we make.

The second point mentioned technical points and I ask myself if there is a way to discuss HIV or any other scientific term without using technical points? Even when I have never used placebo before, at least it isn't given in the hospitals as pills because of ethics, I tried my best to ensure that the post was as personalized as possible.

For the third point which was mentioned on referencing, I guess I have answered it already in the first point but so I respond to it, It is mandatory to reference whatever you are posting on stemsocial

The next point mentioned fluidity and transitioning, I guess I have been able to transition well on this comment to see that even humans can transition and not AIs alone.

The final opinion is very funny because saying I stock to fact just meant I wrote on the topic at hand. I used words like We, let's, and even added words like "Two heads are better than one". So I am trying to understand how this implies that I posted AI generated words?

The conclusion used the word Highly likely and not Certainly or For Sure. This said, I would like to call your attention to a few things in the post including minor typographical errors, my intonations such as words like (Do you that Placebo has been scientifically proven to cure a whole lot of things) which I just realized is a repetition of word because the Whole shouldn't be there. Also, going through the post now, I realized that there were places I forgot to add punctuation which I am certain that an AI would not make such mistake.

I am glad you called my attention to this, but then we are still in the early age of commercial use of AI, and we are still trying to find our feet with it. I will work on making my post more personalized although this cannot be an every time thing because there are a few things I might want to write which I do not have a first hand experience of such as when I want to write a post on HIV, Evolution, Poison, and so on.

On a final note, I hope you see that even when this comment that doesn't cost me 10 minutes to write compared to posts I make that require hours or even days sometime to complete research, write post, and edit, you would still see that it has an Introduction, Body, and Ending, even when I did not mention it. I hope we are able to get a good understanding on AIs and I hope this AI machines start to leave footprints so people who use AI related posts can be identified because not all post that are properly organized are AI generated posts.

Thank you very much for bringing this up, I hope we get better tools to catch people who use AI generated post.

Thanks.