I haven't heard of the others, except Gundry. He's kind of funny. When I hear him present I feel like he'd just have us living of olive oil. 🤣 That said, while I don't fully agree with either his or Mason's opinions, they raise some good points too. Everyone will always draw different conclusions from and data and in science we need that to look at things from varying angles. New hypotheses are how we move forward to investigate and learn from proving or disproving them. If we didn't have that then everyone would just agree on what we currently believe to be the right information and we would no longer progress and learn more. So unless there is intent to harm from them, then I feel it would be a bit extreme to revoke licences from those we don't fully agree with.