This is GREAT!
Looking for good curation tools.
@Gibic gave a link to a tool he has, build, uses. That already gives some form of curation.

I wonder: Can the algo be configured so that each user can decide whether a parameter is included in the algo?
For instance, I don't like the post value as a parameter. The same users get the same high-value votes, most of the time.
I certainly don't like trending like parameters! Same users showing up all the time.

On number of votes: I disagree this isn't a parameter. Undervalued posts get upvotes from curator teams such as Curie, OCD, Curangel, Ecency and many others. These have long vote trails. The number of votes on a post can easily by 500, and still the post is undervalued. Simply because the big value voters don't include these authors in their auto-votes, or don't (manually) slap their votes on posts that aren't already hot/trending.

Quality is key, I believe. Though quality is somehow subjective, I would think we should include 'quality' into the mix. Perhaps we need AI for this. Perhaps this part of the algo is per user: the user connects an AI of their choice, paid by the user; either connected by the user or through a subscription offer from a HIVE service. Preferably, both, but could start with the user configuring it themselves to keep it simple.

As a curator, I am mostly interested in high-quality posts and engagements, as well as undiscovered quality posters. Undiscovered means, undiscovered by the HIVE community (almost no to no votes), but also discovered users by the HIVE community, but not by me.

Am interested in the resault for my username.