Hello acidyo,
Thank you for your response. I understand how OCD works, and I certainly agree that it's an initiative pointing in the right direction; rewarding the people who undertake this work with more value makes perfect sense to me.

However, as other challenges inherent to the ecosystem, I believe from my perspective that mitigating these problems should not rest exclusively on the shoulders of the users (a selected few, in fact). In an ideal world, one should publish when genuinely have something valuable to say. But this premise changes drastically when the economic factor comes into play, which incentivizes a dynamic of constant publication that doesn't always align with the depth or the actual need to communicate.

That being said, I recognize that many of these Base (Hive's structural) problems will likely not have a clear and definitive solution. Even if one were to exist, it would most probably be highly complex and scarcely viable. This is precisely why initiatives like the ones you (and your team) handle are so valuable: they act as palliatives for several of the existing problems that are very difficult to solve.

Pp.