Back in 2017 at a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University Dr. Fauci made an interesting statement. Fauci told the audience the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.
https://zenith.news/dr-anthony-faucis-covid-19-all-boast-no-toast/
By Richard J. Quitliano
Editorialist & NewsHawk
ZENITH NEWS®
WASHINGTON, DC (@ZENINEWS) – In every trial to date Hydroxychloroquine (HCL) has proven effective in both fighting the virus in infected people and as a prophylactic. So, who benefits from withholding it from the public and what’s the holdup in getting it dispensed?
The answer to both is the “Dynamic Duo,” Dr.’s Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx, both of whom are dragging their feet in what’s beginning to look more and more like a political stunt and not due to concerns over efficacy or possible side effects.
Qui Bono?
HCL has been used for decades as an anti-malarial and to treat diseases such as Lupus. In other words, it had been proven safe for years.
Maybe not as safe as aspirin, but close!
Things came to a head yesterday when Trump’s Trade Rep. Peter Navarro and Fauci got into a heated debate about the subject. In a Zerohedge article that cites Axios:
“White House economic adviser got into a massive argument with the coronavirus task force’s Anthony Fauci over the doctor’s ongoing resistance to the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19, despite reports of the drug’s widespread efficacy. According to the report, towards the end of the meeting Hahn began a discussion of the commonly used malaria drug hydroxychloroquine – which was recently rated the ‘most effective therapy‘ for coronavirus according to a global survey of more than 6,000 doctors.”
From Axios:
Fauci pushed back against Navarro, saying that there was only anecdotal evidence that hydroxychloroquine works against the coronavirus.
Researchers have said studies out of France and China are inadequate because they did not include control groups.
Fauci and others have said much more data is needed to prove that hydroxychloroquine is effective against the coronavirus.
As part of his role, Navarro has been trying to source hydroxychloroquine from around the world. He’s also been trying to ensure that there are enough domestic production capabilities inside the U.S.
If the crisis is as desperate as the MSM and others are contending, wouldn’t even anecdotal evidence be impetus enough to take a chance on a drug whose effects are already known? Let’s call a spade a spade; Fauci, as covered in previous articles, is a political animal first and a doctor second.
Political History
Perhaps Fauci hoped to make it through this politically driven virus debacle without anyone taking a look into his politics or his history at the NIH. No such luck. Both he and Birx are deeply entrenched in politics, politics that might outweigh their concern for the American public. Fauci is a Democrat, an admirer of Hillary Clinton, Obama and shares the vision of Bill Gates of turning America into a vaccine police state where biometrics are used to track all Americans. Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, writing for the DC Dirty Laundry states:
“In the last few days, Dr. Fauci has demanded that the entire nation remain locked down until every last infection is snuffed out. He wants the entire population to remain in quarantine lockdowns, in other words, until no more new infections are detected across the entire country. This is an impossible standard to achieve and would likely result in the whole country being locked down for a year or more, utterly destroying what’s left of the US economy.
Similarly, Dr. Birx, as stated in previous articles, is on thye board of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) a Gates-funded entity. She also works for Dr. Fauci at the NIH specializing in AIDs research. Whatever Dr.’s Fauci and Birx are doing, it is not part of President Trump’s efforts to return the country to normal but the opposite.
Rewarding Incompetence
The numbers being projected by Fauci and the CDC have been way off, according to two articles in the Gateway Pundit by Jim Hoft and Christina Laila. Hoft’s article claims that the IHME model, the one used by Fauci & Birx, overestimated the need for ICU beds by 6.4x, hospitalizations by 6x and the need for ventilators by an astonishing 40.5x.
Govt. estimates:
All beds needed: 179,267
CU beds needed: 33,176
Invasive ventilators: 26,544
The actual numbers as recorded at The Covid Tracking Project:
Actual hospitalizations: 22,158
In ICU: 5,207
On ventilator: 656
Ms. Laila states in her article:
T”he Gateway Pundit has reported many times that the Coronavirus models being used to predict hospitalizations are complete garbage. The IHME and Murray models being used to crash the economy have massively overstated the impact of the Coronavirus in 40 different states. These models are using New York and New Jersey data and applying it to the rest of the US. Murray predicted last week that Washington state should have needed nearly 2000 beds for these sick patients.”
But what can you expect from a doctor who’s built a career on being wrong. According to s separate article by Jim Hoft, Fauci’s numbers were equally inaccurate when he was in charge of the NIH’s AIDs project in 1984. Here are a few of Fauci’s misstatements about the AIDs “epidemic.”
“Dr. Fauci claimed that AIDS might be transmissible by “routine close contact.” (May 5, 1983, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association). (Michael Fumento, The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, p. 237).
“Dr. Fauci claimed that ten percent of the HIV/AIDS infected would be heterosexual—more than two and half times the rate – four percent – it actually was.
“On February 15, 1987, then conservative columnist George Will said to Dr. Fauci that HIV/AIDS was principally a homosexual affliction and that it was not exploding and Fauci quickly replied, “That’s not correct. The percentage of individuals who have gotten AIDS by heterosexual transmission is about four percent now. It is projected that that number will be up in 1991 to about 10 percent.”
Fauci’s prediction never panned out… and it is equally probable that his projections about COVID-19 will have the same results. Once again, according to Hoft:
In January Dr. Anthony Fauci told Newsmax TV that the United States did not have to worry about the coronavirus.
Now, three months later, he wants to shut down every state!
Dr. Fauci warned of an apocalyptic pandemic and later compared the coronavirus to a bad flu.
Dr. Fauci based all of his predictions on models and then told reporters this past week, “You can’t really rely on models.”
And on March 20th Dr. Fauci “corrected” the president during a press briefing on hydroxychloroquine saying, “You got to be careful when you say ‘fairly effective.’ It was never done in a clinical trial… It was given to individuals and felt that maybe it worked.”
Qui Bono Again
In keeping with the “follow the money” maxim, one look at Fauci’s history tells us who benefits from his efforts. He has made a career out of pushing the Big Pharma- Vaccine Lobby’s talking points. “Show me your friends and I’ll tell you who you are” is also revealing.
Fauci’s relationships with Hillary, Obama, and Gates tells a lot about him and his politics. Clearly the mainstream media and their penchant for hyperbole and sensationalism benefit from Fauci’s doom and gloom projections. The only prediction that has been accurate so far was one he made in 2017: (From Gateway Pundit)
“Back in 2017 at forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University Dr. Fauci made an interesting statement. Fauci told the audience the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.”
How could he have known?
Perhaps he was tipped off beforehand.
Perhaps this is the “insurance policy” spoken of in the Strozk/Page texts — the one that would save the Deep State after the failed Russia collusion hoax and bogus impeachment attempt. One thing we can know with a degree of certitude; the efforts of both Fauci and Birx are at cross-purposes with the president’s desire to return things to normal.