This is true + downvotes ( and not even Hivewatchers) from other users dont agree feel unfair to users.

It is what it is. With "smart media tokens" it might be different.

But 1 shared reward pool for 1000000 different worldviews and opinions is pretty retarded and will ultimate work like a social credit system.

Offend nobody, be nice to everyone, have no opinion about anything.

Thats not what online culture is. Imagine normal Forums could use Hive as extension for payments ( and can post Content also).

The problem they have a different view what value is and they need a reason to use Hive.

What is the reason to use Hive? There is no reason.

Price is low enough to rework the retarded curation mechanic, maybe make it disappear or make it so low that is has no impact. Hive cant drop below zero, so whats the risk?

Or PPL can vote where the share of the pool should go into. Like tags or communities, so they can Overview it for themselves.

Fight abuse ( is only necessary if spam). Social media is always retarded, so Holders need to accept it or should sell all hive ( i mean long term it will hit 0 if nothing changes).

100x users means more $ for holders. Let them have a place to log in daily, cyclejerk each other ( For that they need hive power, so more demand) and let them have fun.

If abuse is from math to much damage, reduce the % issued in Hive rewards, problem fixed.